How Hilfe Services provide Assessments
Hilfe Services utilises a mix of formal, informal and internally designed adaptive assessment to ensure our professionals are consistent in the acquisition of critical information.
We construct assessments through adaptive choice of meaningful and relevant instruction, measurement, questioning and scoring processes relative to the individual.
We account for the variability of both the professional in the assessment delivery and the variation in the participant capacity to enable optimal interpretation and engagement between professional and participant in assessment.
Our process ensures systemisation of all assessment for all individuals and determines the most important information for holistic treatment planning.
Standard Assessment
VS
Hilfe Services Assessment
Generic Applied Assessment
Standard Administration
For administration of assessment, professionals utilise specific measurements, questions and scoring methods applied with explicit consistency or general consistency.
Standardised Assessments
Explicit Consistency: Administration processes follow specific steps with scripts for questions, precise measurement relative to anatomical landmarks and deterministic mathematical calculations.
- Allen’s cognitive level screen.
- Computed tomography (CT) scans
- Medication administration
General Consistency: Administration processes follow an interpretative guide where professionals can adapt the sequence of questions and measurements to achieve the best outcomes for the assessment.
- Kessler psychological distress scale (K10)
- Movement ABC-2 assessment battery for children.
- World Health Organisation Disability Scale (2.0)
Non-Standardised Assessments
Variable Consistency: Administration processes are derived from an individual organisation or professional to provide specific information through adaptive questions and measurement, derived from professional experience.
- Exercises
- Informal Interviews
- Questionnaires
Standard Measurement
Measurement seeks to provide informational insight through observation of variations between individuals to determine limitations and inform treatment strategies.
Explicit Evaluation: Measurement for a specific independent and dependent variable where results are evaluated against the accuracy of the measurement in a probability threshold. The specific measurement is linked to a defined quantitative metric usually founded in numerical representations.
Implicit Evaluation: Measurement for a specific result where independent and dependent variables are interpreted by an individual through comparison of initial and final outcomes for individuals who share measurement similarities.
Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) from axial (T1-weighted) view of typical brain

Image taken from Chirchiglia.D (2019) under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.
MRI of an evolving moderate-sized subacute left middle cerebral artery branch infarct.

Image taken from Rajdev et.al (2020) under the terms of CC-BY 4.0 license.
Standard Questions
Questions seek to gain information about an individual’s historical (routine) experiences to inform treatment from comparisons made to individuals with similar experiences.
Explicit Histories: Questions about shared commonalities that provide explicit information compared against quantitative research and datasets.
- How many times have you administered insulin within this period?
- How many hours of sleep do you get on average?
- How much money do you spend on weekly expenses?
Implicit Histories: Questions about shared commonalities that provide information based in probability with comparisons made from the interpretation of specific communication against qualitative research and probability metrics.
- How often do you feel like this?
- How would you describe your pain or level of pain?
- How much assistance do you require daily?
Standard Scoring
Scoring establishes a conformal understanding for a general or specific comparison relative to a consistent variable.
Grouped Comparison: Scoring processes find similarities between individuals to establish groups of correlative connections.
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
- Genetical vulnerabilities to diseases such as cancer, heart attack, stroke etc.
Percentile Comparison: Scoring processes plot individuals against a randomised control sample with a specific or grouped capacity analysis.
- Beery Visual Motor Index (VMI)
- Glycated haemoglobin test for Type II diabetes.
Capacity Comparison: Scoring processes make connections between an individual with limitation and an individual without limitation in their capacity.
- Chronic disease blood testing and diagnosis.
- Bedside sit to stand task.
Adaptive Applied Assessment

Adaptive Administration
Written Description
Our artificial intelligence translates existing assessment and diagnostic information as the foundation for modelling the participant. The instruction is guided by dynamic comparison of the intelligence model for the participant against existing research and information established in our assessment and diagnosis database.
Visual Depiction
Established Information

Exponential Relevance Consolidation

Incompleteness Function
Exponential Meaning Extrapolation

Expressed Instruction

Standard Administration vs Adaptive Administration
Administration is the instruction process on a scale of symmetrical or variable applications
Standard administration describes symmetrical approaches as explicitly consistent, variable approaches as variably consistent and generally consistent approaches as a mix between symmetry and variability.
Adaptive administration describes a symmetrical-variable approach where instruction can be performed as a specific question and answer however, is processed with multiple informational parts.
Adaptive Measurement & Questions
Written Description
Our artificial intelligence utilises an information transformation function to manipulate the assessment instruction throughout the administration process. This enables adaptive measurement and questioning that seeks the most meaningful and relevant contributions following information provided by a participant.
Visual Measurement Depiction


Visual Question Depiction
Standard Measurement vs Adaptive Measurement
Measurement is the objective evaluation approaches on a scale of explicit or implicit results.
Standard measurement describes explicit approaches as inconsistencies in application which causes specific inaccuracies in results whereas implicit approaches are generally inconsistent in the information produced however, inaccurate due to interpretation required for comparisons.
Adaptive measurement describes an explicit-implicit approach, that utilises inconsistency in results to evaluate the measurement approach. The evaluation considers both the specific inaccuracies and general interpretations to decide an adaptive measurement sequence for both professionals and participants.
Standard Questions vs Adaptive Questions
Questioning is the subjective evaluation process on a scale of explicit or implicit histories.
Standard questioning describes explicit processes as inconsistencies caused by professional choice for specific results and implicit processes as inconsistencies caused by conformity in participant interpretation of information.
Adaptive questioning describes an explicit-implicit process, that utilises inconsistency in interpretations to evaluate the questioning process. The evaluation considers the specific interpretation question expression and the general interpretation question reception to dynamically adapt the interaction.
Adaptive Scoring
Written Description
Our artificial intelligence utilises information independence to consolidate all questions and measurements under a consistent method of exponential probability for assessment outcomes. These collections can construct a unique diagnosis that can be compared through an adaptation on differential diagnosis to expand further on assessment information.
Standard Scoring vs Adaptive Scoring
Scoring is the comparative calculation process on a scale of similarity and difference.
Standard scoring describes grouped comparison as consistency in calculation by similarity with parameterisation, capacity comparisons create consistency in calculation by difference with definitiveness, percentile comparison apply definitive similarities to a chosen group of individuals.
Adaptive scoring describes consistency in calculation by consolidating similarity and difference in the form of a question or solution with definitive meaning and value. The consolidation considers the information restriction by the parameter on the group comparison and the similarity on the individual comparison.
Want to discuss our services?
Ready to get started?
You can email us directly with relevant information or to find out more